What Happened
On Feb. 20, in a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court held that President Trump lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad, across‑the‑board tariffs on most U.S. trading partners. The ruling wipes out two main IEEPA tariff programs: the ‘reciprocal’ tariffs (including a 10% default rate on most imports and higher rates for certain countries) and the 25% ‘fentanyl’ tariffs on selected goods from Canada, China, and Mexico.
Importantly, tariffs imposed under other legal authorities remain in effect, including Section 232 duties on steel and aluminum (currently at 25% and 50%, respectively), automobiles and auto parts (25%), copper, lumber, semiconductors, and certain furniture items.
What We Don’t Yet Know
While today’s ruling is a landmark decision, several critical questions remain unanswered and will directly affect financial reporting, cash flows, and sourcing decisions.
Refunds of tariffs already paid. The Court did not address whether or how the government must return the estimated $129–$175 billion in IEEPA tariff revenue already collected from importers. Justice Kavanaugh warned in his dissent that “refunds of billions of dollars would have significant consequences for the U.S. Treasury.” Legal experts expect the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to manage the refund process. Importers should not expect automatic refunds; they will likely need to affirmatively file refund claims.
Replacement tariffs under alternative authorities. The White House has signaled it is prepared to use other legal tools to reimpose tariffs. Section 301 (unfair trade practices), Section 232 (national security), Section 122 (balance of payments), and Section 338 (trade discrimination) all remain available. There are currently 12 active Section 232 investigations, and the administration’s “inclusion process” allows tariffs on derivative products, meaning tariff exposure could expand quickly to hundreds of additional product categories.
Impact on existing trade deals and negotiations. Many of the tariffs were being used as leverage to negotiate bilateral trade agreements. The ruling could force the administration to renegotiate these arrangements on a different legal footing, creating a period of uncertainty around the terms of recently announced deals with countries like the U.K., Japan, and others.
Consumer prices and pass-through effects. Economists caution that prices are unlikely to drop dramatically or quickly. Many businesses absorbed tariff costs rather than passing them through, and existing Section 232 tariffs on metals and vehicles remain.
What This Means For Manufacturers
Today’s ruling should provide some near-term relief on input costs for manufacturers that have been sourcing imported components subject to IEEPA tariffs. However, with Section 232 duties on steel (25%), aluminum (50%), autos, and other goods still intact, cost pressures will persist for many operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Are all tariffs eliminated?
A: No. Only tariffs imposed under IEEPA authority are affected. Tariffs on steel, aluminum, automobiles, auto parts, copper, lumber, semiconductors, and certain other goods imposed under Section 232 and other statutes remain fully in effect.
Q: Will my company get a refund for IEEPA tariffs we’ve already paid?
A: Possibly, but the process is uncertain. The Supreme Court did not establish a refund mechanism, which will be handled by the Court of International Trade and U.S. Customs.
Q: How should we account for potential tariff refunds in our financial statements?
A: This is an emerging area that we are monitoring closely. Companies should begin documenting their IEEPA tariff payments and assessing recoverability. Any potential refund receivable will need to be evaluated under applicable accounting guidance for gain contingencies and the probability of collection.
Q: Could new tariffs be imposed to replace the ones struck down?
A: Yes. The administration has indicated it intends to use alternative legal authorities, including Section 232, Section 301, and potentially Section 122 and Section 338. These pathways generally require formal investigations and public proceedings, which could take months, but the scope of potential replacement tariffs is broad.
Our Commitment
We understand how significantly trade policy volatility has impacted your operations, your margins, and your ability to plan. GBQ’s manufacturing industry team is actively monitoring developments from the Court, the White House, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and Congress. We will provide updated guidance as the refund process takes shape and as any replacement tariff actions are announced.
If you have questions about how today’s ruling affects your specific situation, whether related to tariff refund recovery, financial statement implications, or supply chain planning, please do not hesitate to reach out to your engagement team. We are here to help you navigate this.
By Mike Purcell, CPA, Partner, Assurance & Advisory
Looking for more manufacturing insights? Check out these resources:
2026 Manufacturing Industry Predictions
What The OBBBA Means For Business Tax Planning
